3 ms·
Ah, that seems pretty reasonable. I think my biggest problem is that when I'm interviewing I'll try to answer too quickly before thinking through a problem comp
by TheAceOfHearts 13y ago
Ah, that seems pretty reasonable. I think my biggest problem is that when I'm interviewing I'll try to answer too quickly before thinking through a problem completely.
But I love discussions too, and if it's something I'm comfortable with, I could keep talking about the topic for as long as the interviewer wants.
I think there's value in recognizing when you don't know the answer to something. I had an interviewer ask me the difference between call and apply in JavaScript, at the time I wasn't sure, so I started to answer him... I explain that I knew you could use both to set the context in which the function was called, but eventually I just said: I'm not sure. And the interviewer gladly explained it to me.
In my case I got an internship where they gave me a 24 hour project to demonstrate my skills. I found that way less stressful than any interview I've ever had. And after the internship the company was so happy that they offered me a full time job!
- radicalbyte 13y agoOh, that's exactly what I want to hear: everyone has gaps in their knowledge and it takes guts to admit it. As long as you can see that, and know where to gain the knowledge, than that won't be a problem. Unless that knowledge is something vital and general. I.e. like not knowing what HTML is. In the future I want to use internships to find younger engineers - it lets you get to know people a bit, and keeps new ideas flowing through the company.