4 ms·
part of me thinks they'd better go the traditional bank route and just directly lend the money to companies/people (somehow it's also an active investment). The
by nraynaud 13y ago
part of me thinks they'd better go the traditional bank route and just directly lend the money to companies/people (somehow it's also an active investment). They could tell their customer: "we financed this bridge, we financed this company, we financed this farmer's crop" and when there is a loss, they could explain that the company failed or the bridge could not get off the ground for some reason or the weather was bad for the crop.
I don't think the current level of indirection is useful, and I don't think computer shakes the hand of the customer saying "let's build this road".
- Daniel_Newby 13y agoThe indirection is useful when exit time rolls around. If you directly finance a bridge in a city that wins a major new factory, you have to figure out how to market and sell your share of their improved taxing ability. If you bought a government bond, you simply issue a sell order priced to account for the lower risk of default.