4 ms·
Dear telecoms: Please give me a credit-card-sized e-ink-based phone which does nothing but send and receive texts and has a standby battery life of a week. Th
by Eliezer 13y ago
Dear telecoms: Please give me a credit-card-sized e-ink-based phone which does nothing but send and receive texts and has a standby battery life of a week. Thank you.
- wffurr 13y agoDo you mean like this? http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Motofone-F3-Dual-Band-1900-International/dp/B0013A7KMW/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Motofone-F3-Dual-Band-1900-In...
- mellamoyo 13y agoI've actually owned that phone. It really, really does not work well, even for just calls. My battery life when using it was atrocious. Also, send/receiving texts was a very difficult task.
- magic_haze 13y agoAgreed. The battery life was surprisingly short, given the epaper screen and the lack of any features. The UI was a product of a completely deranged mind. The only way to get to some really common settings is to press dozens of random buttons, like game cheat codes. It doesn't even have the ability to sync the clock from the phone network, so I constantly had to reset the clock (!). The idea is good, but the implementation sucks badly in every single dimension.
- BCM43 13y agoHow would it alert you of texts?
- __--__ 13y agoWhat would that look like? The peek[1], but with an e-ink screen? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peek_(mobile_Internet_device) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peek_(mobile_Internet_device)
- drivingmenuts 13y agoI'd also like an option on one that looks nice, but only does calling and a directory with no texting. I so rarely text that I don't need that feature. However, people send me texts that I don't read, yet somehow expect me to have read them. I'd rather just have them get a message back saying my phone doesn't support that feature, so they know to call me.