3 ms·
. . . I don't recall mentioning journalists? I also wasn't aware that journalists could unilaterally free convicted felons. I think the state's own findings ar
by yew 13y ago
. . . I don't recall mentioning journalists? I also wasn't aware that journalists could unilaterally free convicted felons.
I think the state's own findings are quite sufficient. The trick is to incentivize their use without unduly obstructing other operations of equal importance.
- rayiner 13y agoA state engaging in an official process of finding the facts is called litigation. What should be sufficient showing to trigger this litigation against a prosecutor? In this case, it was a journalist writing an article. So you're basically saying prosecutors should be subject to litigation based on articles by journalist.
- yew 13y agoI'm well aware of the mechanics, thank you. The state has already satisfied itself sufficiently to reverse a murder conviction. If the investigation that led to that course of action was causally descended from an article written by a journalist - what of it? If you believe that the actions taken by the state up to this point were unwarranted, say so explicitly. Otherwise, please recognize that I am not talking about journalists here.