3 ms·
It is usually ruled that the plaintiffs can't prove standing, meaning they can't prove they were harmed by the behavior. And of course one would probably need a
by sseveran 13y ago
It is usually ruled that the plaintiffs can't prove standing, meaning they can't prove they were harmed by the behavior. And of course one would probably need access to their raw data to prove standing, so its unlikely that the courts are the way to go. Even if the court does rule that its illegal it is almost impossible to enforce. The FISA court ruled that certain things were not permissible but the NSA did them anyhow.