I'm running 32-bit Firefox in Windows Server 2008 x64 and I have no issues with this what so ever. It's stable, working and you shouldn't really need more than

I'm running 32-bit Firefox in Windows Server 2008 x64 and I have no issues with this what so ever. It's stable, working and you shouldn't really need more than 4GB of memory for a web-browser anyway. Compared to the minefield of bugs that is Minefield (64-bit FF builds), coupled with lousy plug-in support, the 32-bit version is a by far superior option. I'm not saying you have to run Chrome, as I'm kinda fed up with the hype, but why would you make lack of 64-bit support a show-stopper for something like a web-browser? For a DB-server needing massive amounts of RAM I could see the point, but for a web-browser?