I don't know if I agree. Owen's letter seemed to pretend that Kasparov didn't lose the last match. Why would Hsu need to establish himself as a competitor when

I don't know if I agree. Owen's letter seemed to pretend that Kasparov didn't lose the last match. Why would Hsu need to establish himself as a competitor when he won the last match? That doesn't make any sense to me. When he says things like, "All he had was a computer chip with no organization or sponsor behind him." it's ridiculous. That chip is the chip that contains the data and knowledge that beat Gary last time, and he can't get any sponsors because they won't commit to a match. Looking at both letters, it seems that all Hsu wanted to do was get another match and Kasparov didn't really want to do it. I certainly could be wrong, but it sounded like they were making excuses.