3 ms·
He didn't say anything about the current owner, only the original intent of the name. Even then, I think your reaction might be a little over the top.
by weego 13y ago
He didn't say anything about the current owner, only the original intent of the name. Even then, I think your reaction might be a little over the top.
- nwh 13y agoThe insinuation is that the current site is somehow tainted by it's use back in 2007, but as far as I can find [1] it was never anything but a "coming soon"page. It's fairly common to ridicule it's current use in the Bitcoin world by associating the currency exchange with playing cards. [1]: http://web.archive.org/web/20070817170606/http://mtgox.com/gwt/mtgox.php http://web.archive.org/web/20070817170606/http://mtgox.com/g...
- Ntrails 13y agoWhy would anyone consider mtg something worthy of ridicule?
- shadytrees 13y agoNo way. MTG is super awesome; the fact that Mt.Gox is indirectly linked to Magic only makes it cooler.