4 ms·

Wikipedia is not the ultimate repository of human knowledge, particularly when it comes to more tricky questions like "what is a scientist?"... If we're going

by swombat 13y ago

Wikipedia is not the ultimate repository of human knowledge, particularly when it comes to more tricky questions like "what is a scientist?"... If we're going to throw definitions around, how about dictionary.com: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/scientist?s=t http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/scientist?s=t > an expert in science, especially one of the physical or natural sciences.

foobarbazqux 13y ago
Actually I think Wikipedia is pretty good for tricky questions, in that they attract a lot of attention and receive a lot of edits. If being a scientist is determined by the consensus of one's peers, it seems like it makes sense to accept an article defining what scientists are that is written as a consensus opinion. But anyway, if you think it's wrong, why don't you edit it?