I'm pretty sure you literally said "popping up shareware nag-screens at random intervals" instead of "that's equivalen to", but whatever, I'll take your word fo

I'm pretty sure you literally said "popping up shareware nag-screens at random intervals" instead of "that's equivalen to", but whatever, I'll take your word for it, in good faith, that you did not edit your post and that I read your post wrong. Wait, what... You edited this line into your reply hours after you initially posted it. Hoping I would miss it or something? And in this very edit you have the nerve to suggest I edit my comment after the fact to spin shit around? Look at the position of the 'popping up' phrase in my post. How would saying it in any way other than it's written make any sense, syntactically? And why would I claim passenger pops up literal nag screens, when everyone knows that's complete nonsense? I do appreciate you showing your true colors in this thread. I'll make sure to link to it every time I run into one of your 'PR excursions' in the future.