> For general writing collaboration I would seriously consider not allowing arbitrary branches. Most people just get confused managing multiple independent outs

> For general writing collaboration I would seriously consider not allowing arbitrary branches. Most people just get confused managing multiple independent outstanding branches that potentially branched from different points in the history. Yep, absolutely true. > One restriction could be that each user gets a single branch (their suggested change). As changes get merged into HEAD each user's branch must be rebased (with a click) before they can add more changes to it. Heavily considering this approach.