3 ms·
Correcting your question to replace "state or country" with "jurisdiction", considering the extreme variance of gun laws within the USA, the answer is it does m
by ctdonath 13y ago
Correcting your question to replace "state or country" with "jurisdiction", considering the extreme variance of gun laws within the USA, the answer is it does make a difference.
There is growing evidence that criminals DO, at least to a meaningful degree (hey, they're criminals - most are stupid), choose their targets based on odds of the would-be victim fighting back. Of late and in particular, several mass murders have occurred in "gun-free zones" when more convenient/suitable (to the killer) venues existed but allowed civilian weapon carry.
Parallel answer to your question is that the measured violent crime rates you reference are too broad, aggregating a few small high-violence areas with broad low-violence zones, creating misguided statistics.
- hga 13y agoALL the notorious recent mass murders except for the Arizona Congresswoman shooting happened in gun free zones. If the people right there hadn't restrained the shooter he would likely have been stopped by an armed citizen who showed up moments later (while the restraining was still an act in progress).