I agree. That's his main point. He also touches on two points which I thought were worth calling out: (1) No source for a Simple Math of Everything exists (

I agree. That's his main point. He also touches on two points which I thought were worth calling out: (1) No source for a Simple Math of Everything exists (ie he'd like to write one) (2) If it did exist, there are many benefits to it even beyond gaining new knowledge (for example, reading Feynman's lectures greatly enriched his world view)