> they're not sharing wins from stellar candidates but they take blame for bad ones. It often seems like hiring stellar candidates involves circumventing HR po

> they're not sharing wins from stellar candidates but they take blame for bad ones. It often seems like hiring stellar candidates involves circumventing HR policy. HR responds, instead of asking how they can help be part of the solution in the future, by incorporating new policy. Hiring stellar candidates, therefore, creates a situation where it makes it harder to hire stellar candidates in the future. There is no "win" in that game.