4 ms·
man, i'm sorry, but your stretch your personal unfortunate experience too far. Such broad statements require good links. I already posted this in the other plac
by VladRussian2 13y ago
man, i'm sorry, but your stretch your personal unfortunate experience too far. Such broad statements require good links. I already posted this in the other place : http://nccam.nih.gov/health/chiropractic/introduction.htm http://nccam.nih.gov/health/chiropractic/introduction.htm
- tghw 13y agoWhat is the point of this link? NIH is policy, not science. You have failed to provide a single piece of scientific research that chiropractors can properly diagnose and treat kyphosis. On the other hand, problems with the practice are widely documented: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/may/14/dangers-chiropractic-treatment-under-reported http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/may/14/dangers-...
- VladRussian2 13y ago>What is the point of this link? NIH is policy, not science. that is outright fantasy. http://nih.gov/about/ http://nih.gov/about/ "NIH is made up of 27 Institutes and Centers, each with a specific research agenda, often focusing on particular diseases or body systems." My experience with a specific NIH's center - NCBI - and their work clearly correlates with it, they [ ie. their own researchers] are doing fundamental science. The rest of your statements goes the same way.