Do you have links to the studies they're quoting? As others have mentioned here, science reporting tends to be sensationalist and inaccurate - sometimes less t

Do you have links to the studies they're quoting? As others have mentioned here, science reporting tends to be sensationalist and inaccurate - sometimes less than other times - and I find it's generally more useful to at least skim the abstract of the paper referenced. (And if possible, look for big obvious holes in the methodology too.)