3 ms·
Have you ever known a characteristically "feminist" woman whom you'd describe as "pleasant"? Feminism does not lead to fulfilling life-choices. Computer science
by thras 17y ago
Have you ever known a characteristically "feminist" woman whom you'd describe as "pleasant"? Feminism does not lead to fulfilling life-choices. Computer science, for example, is not the most emotionally fulfilling career around for women, even though they're constantly being hectored by well-meaning "feminists" to go into it. On that subject at least, most women vote with their feet.
The current sexual politics of soft polygamy, created mainly by feminism, benefits no one except for a few "alpha" males. It's terrible for the majority of men. It's terrible for children. It's terrible for women over the age of 25.
"Soul-destroying" is the best term for the modern dating scene. Be prepared to sleep with a lot of women before you find someone to marry (who has also slept with a lot of people and who has wound up rather damaged from it all). If you're lucky, she may be young enough to have kids without the help of too many fertility treatments, and you'll have a few blissful years before she divorces you and takes the kids and the money.
- timcederman 17y agoWow, how did you get 6 points with a post like this? I feel you've missed what the goal of feminism is and instead focus on militant-feminists who give the movement a bad name, much like militant-atheists do for atheism.
- thras 17y agoI get 6 points because at least 6 other people here found it insightful. Now, whatever the "goal" of feminism is doesn't matter. Just like the "goal" of communism never mattered. Results are what matter. And the results of feminism have been terrible for almost everyone.
- timcederman 17y agoPoint taken on goals. However I can't see (measurably) how feminism has been terrible for everyone? When you look at pay differences, military service, voting, health, etc, feminism seems to definitely have helped.