2 ms·
My interpretation of it was the the $20,000 investment was small change to the company, and was most likely never given a legitimate second thought by his fathe
by brk 17y ago
My interpretation of it was the the $20,000 investment was small change to the company, and was most likely never given a legitimate second thought by his father.
- jyothi 17y agoRight I understood your point and could be very valid. But for 90% owning, I have my doubts. Anyway what I felt was later when his dad would have seen his son's business blooming he should have done something about it. Asked him to buy back early or at least let him know that for all his work he owns just 10% and it just the first investment.