3 ms·
Not a lawyer, but if the software project had an independent owner for its trademark, I believe that they'd have a case against 10gen. The name is deliberately
by kingkilr 13y ago
Not a lawyer, but if the software project had an independent owner for its trademark, I believe that they'd have a case against 10gen. The name is deliberately chosen to provoke confusion between the two.
- saalweachter 13y agoThe MongoDB project was started by 10gen. I would be surprised if someone else owned the trademark. So the new name is not so much deliberately chosen to provoke confusion as it is to reduce confusion.
- pigscantfly 13y agoTheir previous full name was "10gen: the MongoDB Company"; they've been trying to dispel confusion over the company name vs. product for a long time (probably since they pivoted towards making Mongo the main business product - 10gen started as a PaaS company). source: worked there Edit: the title of this submission should really be "10gen: the MongoDB Company shortens their name to MongoDB, Inc." Less attention-grabby, more truthy.