3 ms·
The article is from 2005, and I'm reasonably sure that nearly every geek in the world has read it already.
by datashaman 13y ago
The article is from 2005, and I'm reasonably sure that nearly every geek in the world has read it already.
- brianmcc 13y agoEvery couple years it resurfaces and every couple of years it still seems painfully relevant and current. And I keep reading it, sniggering away, each time :-)
- readme 13y agoSome people might have just started programming last year. Why would they have read this article in 2005?
- pivnicek 13y agoMy first encounter, and it would have hit the nail on the head, if I'd bother to spend the 3 weeks developing it.
- danielweber 13y agoStill relevant. I hate how, instead of being good at "technology X," employers are requiring people to be skilled at "company Y's version of technology X."
- niuzeta 13y agoI think we're past the era of overusage on design patterns and the dreaded factory factory factories?
- alan_cx 13y agoShakespeare is still a great read.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- atc 13y agoI hadn't read it. I disliked the article -- over simplified, far too general, poor analogy -- but it was new to me.