> All that overhead is there for a reason. SQLite's classic use case is where SQL-like access to data would be convenient but a full RDBMS would be tremendousl

> All that overhead is there for a reason. SQLite's classic use case is where SQL-like access to data would be convenient but a full RDBMS would be tremendously inconvenient, e.g. embedded systems. People seem to be citing inappropriate environments for SQLite as reasons to say it is of no value. You get the same sort of silliness from NoSQL zealots.