9 ms·

Yes it was. Let's not quibble.

• pearjuice 13y ago
  No it was not. It implies something under Google their control was compromised which was not the case.
  • hack_edu 13y ago
    Really, it implies any attack or breach that is apparent to users. This is very apparent.
    • pearjuice 13y ago
      That is not what "hacked" means. If they had really hacked Google their servers and proxied all searches through a system of theirs without letting the users know it would not have been "apparent" yet Google was hacked in the correct sense of the definition. They were defaced which was directly apparent to users - not hacked. At all.
      • hack_edu 13y ago
        I'll repeat the crux of this discussion. There's no definition of 'hacked.' Welcome to the Internet.
        • pearjuice 13y ago
          No definition of "hacked"? Really? You will go that meta to prove your point? "a hacker is someone who seeks and exploits weaknesses in a computer system or computer network" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_(computer_security) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_(computer_security) ) Being hacked means a hacker has found and exploited a weakness in a computer system or network. Saying that Google Palestine was hacked is false because no exploit in a computer system or computer network OF Google Palestine was found nor exploited.
        • smtddr 13y ago
          if i stood in front of your house with a cellphone jammer, did i just hack your cellphone service provider?
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]