> Plus, we needed a cookie just to store whether or not the user clicked "yes" or "no," so in effect we were forced to break the law no matter what we did. thi

> Plus, we needed a cookie just to store whether or not the user clicked "yes" or "no," so in effect we were forced to break the law no matter what we did. this means you didnt' waste too much brain cells after all. if user clicks no, you either show it everytime, or set a session cookie, which is not supposed to be saved on disk per the specs. if the browser decide to save it on disk, it's their problem. But if you set a no cookie. then it's the typical governemnt contractor. Going the extra mile to bill for the law, but completely ignoring the law purpose and benefits.