3 ms·
It's totally true, and even when it's vitriolic and in the news I would probably just read the title and skip the article.
by nraynaud 13y ago
It's totally true, and even when it's vitriolic and in the news I would probably just read the title and skip the article.
- jlgreco 13y agoAh, some of them are very high quality though! Take this one for example: Ok, I have a better plan. - you learn to fly by flapping your arms fast enough - you then learn to pee burning gasoline - then, you fly around New York, setting everybody you see on fire, until people make you emperor. Sounds like a good plan, no? http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0506/5299.html http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0506/5299.html No matter how many times I read that, I always laugh.
- rmccue 13y agoI love Linus' followup to this later: On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 linux@horizon.com wrote: > > > But perhaps slightly impractical. > > There are just few laws of physics it violates. Yeah, yeah. You avoided a few laws of phsyics of your own. [...] My plan was more interesting, I feel. http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0506/5308.html http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0506/5308.html