2 ms·
Ripping functionality out from under paying customers is not something that just "bothers" people. Hiding behind terms of use on SDKs isn't something that mell
by jlgreco 13y ago
Ripping functionality out from under paying customers is not something that just "bothers" people. Hiding behind terms of use on SDKs isn't something that mellows the sting of this to users who probably don't even know what "SDK" means.
This situation invokes to comparisons to certain companies that had rather poor reputations in the 90s. Companies the slogan was almost certainly meant to differentiate Google from.
If hyperbole to shareholders is a-okay with you but hyperbole from angered consumers is out of line, then we just are not going to see eye-to-eye on this. I hope people inside Google do not share your attitude or Google truly is doomed to become what they assured us they wouldn't. This attitude towards consumers is extremely toxic.
- BitMastro 13y agoI see that you prefer downvoting rather then having a discussion, so I will stop here. Edit: Apologies, I didn't know that rule, it was obviously someone else.
- jlgreco 13y ago1) I responded to you. Obviously. You just replied to my response to you. 2) Because your comment was in response to one of mine, it is impossible for me to downvote it. I can only downvote comments that are in response to others.