You can provide the illusion of invalidating any argument if you distill it down far enough. That said, there's no argument in this piece. He suggests that the

You can provide the illusion of invalidating any argument if you distill it down far enough. That said, there's no argument in this piece. He suggests that the affordability of X is not well-known, and given its low cost and terrific upside, it's a feasible and responsible addition to any company's benefits. What are you not clear about?