3 ms·

If that's the only thing you can find to criticize, OP's done a good job. I really like it. I couldn't seem to get the pausing/unpausing to work with my trackp

• workhere-io 13y ago
  I actually thought it'd be helpful to OP to point out that the text is hard to read. It's called constructive criticism - nothing wrong with that.
  • cpayne 13y ago
    It can be a fine line between criticism and it being "constructive"
    • bowerbird 13y ago
      i've found that it's best to consider all criticism to be "constructive", even if you're sure it's not, as it thwarts the person who was trying to hurt you. -bowerbird
      • bowerbird 13y ago
        somebody -- namely the person who down-voted this -- seems to have a very thin skin, and evidently is not able to take my advice. oh well, such is life, i guess. :+) -bowerbird
• serf 13y ago
  Not all criticism is negative. Products are not perfect off the bat, they are improved gradually by the criticisms of the creator and the people exposed to it. In fact, I opened this thread to see if anyone had complained about the typography, as I was going to if not. Furthermore, while I agree that OP did a good job, I disagree with you about the fact that typography is somehow minor. ('if that's the only thing...") How useful is a site to someone who can't read it? How many people don't bother seeing the actual mechanics of a site when they realize they need to squint to make anything out? The page consists of two elements, text and a button. Half of the elements are very difficult for a user to interact with. That's important, regardless of how spectacular the other half is. Good job OP. like someone earlier said, it reminds me of the webcollage xscreensaver