>> Had it succeeded he probably would have gotten the kind of credit regularly attributed to that other company head named Steve. Some times some statements wi

>> Had it succeeded he probably would have gotten the kind of credit regularly attributed to that other company head named Steve. Some times some statements within an article show such negative attitude that it becomes difficult to take the rest of the article seriously. I don't know why the author has such resentment towards 'that other company head named Steve' and why he feels to need to mention it at all. Also in one paragraph it is mentioned that Steve is a hero. The paragraph immediately following that states that he couldn't get things put together at the same time or execute his plans. How does a CEO become a hero when he is not able to deliver the most important things expected of him? A very confusing article this one.