2 ms·
Really - making valuations on a per user basis? Kind of weird especially considering their growth. Currently Facebook is projecting $550M in revenues this year
by mikeryan 17y ago
Really - making valuations on a per user basis? Kind of weird especially considering their growth.
Currently Facebook is projecting $550M in revenues this year, that would put them at about 20x earnings (for 10B valuation). That doesn't consider profit/loss but its a standard measurement. This is a moderate 20x P/E for a growing company and not a horrible valuation.
compare that with twitter's $0 in revenues and you have a better comparison.
Youtube is projecting about $240M in revenues
http://newteevee.com/2009/04/03/analyst-youtube-could-lose-470m-this-year/ http://newteevee.com/2009/04/03/analyst-youtube-could-lose-4...
But with a higher burn rate per user so its way further in the hole.
MySpace is projecting $490M in revenues so it's inline with Facebook considering they're very close to the same rate, I have to believe that considering the way facebook is growing compared to MySpace that it would get a better valuation (if comparing the two side by side as standalone businesses)
All revenue numbers from pretty much first google hit
- charlesju 17y agoP/E is price to earnings. Not price to sales.
- mdasen 17y agoJust to clarify: earnings are not revenues. Earnings are revenues - costs. Facebook and Twitter's valuations are both infinitely times their earnings since neither has any earnings right now. However, their negative earnings are still important (especially on a per-user basis). So, Facebook's P/E ratio is non-existent since they have no earnings.
- eru 17y agoNot infinity. More like a negative number. (Otherwise, I agree.)