3 ms·
To be meaningful, "what ifs" must be based on scenarios that are somehow comparable. The two I called out implicate not property rights, but fundamental constit
by nknighthb 13y ago
To be meaningful, "what ifs" must be based on scenarios that are somehow comparable. The two I called out implicate not property rights, but fundamental constitutional rights.
- dllthomas 13y agoThat's not an absurd objection, but you should have made it clearer. All I got from your comment was an assertion that these things weren't the case, and of course they're not the case - that was the point of the preceding comment.