3 ms·
That certainly may be a reasonable argument to make. But they already lost. A court found that this was, after all, not reasonable. And at this point all argui
by revelation 13y ago
That certainly may be a reasonable argument to make. But they already lost. A court found that this was, after all, not reasonable.
And at this point all arguing over what seems sane under the law[1] becomes pointless. It's a political decision to continue to appeal the supreme court, not a legal one.
And this administration has decided that police should be able to do a complete search of your phone after having arrested you. A search without a warrant, since all the discretion to arrest is with the police.
[1]: a law from 18xx, where people were lucky to carry some coins with them, not their life on digital storage media.
- rayiner 13y ago> That certainly may be a reasonable argument to make. But they already lost. A court found that this was, after all, not reasonable. The 1st Circuit does not state the law of the land. It's a reasonable position, up against another very reasonable position, and it's up to the Supreme Court to decide to adopt one or the other.