3 ms·
Obviously nobody is interessted. Not because the system is bad, because Apple user want to use Apple and not an Open Source alternative. It make more sense to
by progx 13y ago
Obviously nobody is interessted. Not because the system is bad, because Apple user want to use Apple and not an Open Source alternative.
It make more sense to create a good emulator, so you can use OpenSource System (like Debian, BSD,...) and native Mac OS Software.
- jws 13y agoI would be thrilled to have a solid Darwin that runs on commodity hardware so the servers could run the same code as the clients. The last I looked at actually running Darwin it looked like there was no effort from Apple to maintain a runnable Darwin. The lowest risk option was writing the code twice, a waste of resources we could have done without.
- cantankerous 13y agoWhich servers and which software? I'm curious. Most of the stuff in that realm is platform independent, anyway.
- jws 13y agoI want to run my own daemons on the server. But I want them to be written in Objective-C and use the Foundation libraries. This is all part of Apple's Darwin released code, it just doesn't run on anything. I want to have access to the instant scalability of the various VPS and dedicated box providers, but with Apple ecosystem code. Apple abandoned the datacenter hardware market long ago, unfortunately, they took the datacenter deployment options with them.
- kazagistar 13y agoHow much of the system is this even? A kernel is not really enough to run software on, not easily at least.