4 ms·
It's the hardware and the fact that it's Unix. Seriously, the Macbook Pro is a beautifully designed machine. The only things that could compete with it would be
by primelens 13y ago
It's the hardware and the fact that it's Unix. Seriously, the Macbook Pro is a beautifully designed machine. The only things that could compete with it would be similarly priced Thinkpads etc, but you have to install and customize your OS on them.
I agree that the OS X interface is overhyped but most of the problems you mention can be fixed in a couple of minutes. I use a free window manager to do basic manipulation and enabling the folder hierarchy view in Finder offers a better solution than the up-button. These are insignificant tweaks compared to what one would need to get a Linux desktop set up just so (although that has gotten easy enough to the point that it isn't a big deal for slightly technically literate users, but I still wouldn't install Ubuntu on my parents' notebook).
But underneath the interface is good old BSD-flavored Unix. Macports is an okay solution for package management. That combined with iterm and vim is all I care about - all running on rock solid hardware.
- Mordak 13y ago> Macports is an okay solution for package management. People give macports a hard time, but I've never been sure why. It does binary or source distribution. It finds and fixes broken library linkage after upgrades. You can prune your install tree easily with the leaves target. All the functions are under one command, and it comes with a clear and concise manpage. I've used ports, pkgsrc, apt and rpm, and am generally very happy with macports in comparison, especially since default binary installs.. Anyway, I'm not trying to start an argument or anything - your opinion is your opinion. Besides, even if OS X users don't like macports for package management they can always use homebrew (or fink, I guess).