3 ms·
You're the one using the wrong words: actual experts on concurrency and parallelism disagree with you: http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/parallel
by anaphor 13y ago
You're the one using the wrong words: actual experts on concurrency and parallelism disagree with you:
http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/parallelism-is-not-concurrency/ http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/parallelism-...
http://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism http://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism
http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/parallelism-concurrency/ http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/parallelism-co...
- nknighthb 13y agoOh? Then why don't they say anything in their posts that disagrees with my view on the subject? (Hint: You're replying to the first comment I made in this thread, so the idea that I used the words "concurrent" or "parallel" in any particular way, much less wrongly, is objectively incorrect.)