3 ms·
No surprise there. Being 19 and male is miserable, except for the few who are lucky enough to find a soulmate that early, and the low-quality sort of man who te
by loch_ness_350 17y ago
No surprise there. Being 19 and male is miserable, except for the few who are lucky enough to find a soulmate that early, and the low-quality sort of man who tends to be more generally successful at that age, but I'd much rather be a single 40-year-old man than a single woman at that age.
I wonder how these findings play out for people who are in long-term stable relationships. I'd bet that there isn't a huge gender disparity or "cross-over" for them, since their happiness depends largely on the health of the relationship, and the number of alternatives isn't really relevant.
- TriinT 17y ago"Being 19 and male is miserable, except for the few who are lucky enough to find a soulmate that early" I get the impression that you didn't enjoy college. Who wants a soulmate so early? Seriously. Only weak and / or disabled people need someone else to look after them at the age of 19.
- loch_ness_350 17y agoFinding a soulmate at 19 is not necessary for happiness, but the dating position of a 19-year-old male sucks, and that's one way of getting out of having to go through that. Most women his age either want older men, or frat-boy douchebags whose IQs are the square root of mine or yours.