4 ms·
I'm not sure precisely how to interpret your comment. It sounds like your personal observations but does not offer a conclusion. (And we're so conditioned to
by bhauer 13y ago
I'm not sure precisely how to interpret your comment. It sounds like your personal observations but does not offer a conclusion. (And we're so conditioned to assume people only share stories in order to make a point!)
When you say...
> Chauvinistic or not, I truly believe if the reward were there, our society would have more women in leadership positions.
Specifically, what is the reward you are describing and how does it differ from the reward available for men? Are you saying you believe the reward to incent women to management would need to be greater (putting aside the uncertainty about how to define "greater") than the rewards that sufficiently incent men?
- mblack68 13y agoLegitimate question. But it is a trap. I'm under a new user name here, but I used to post here years ago. Every answer I give will get me closer to hell-banning. :) I will think about it. If I can find a way to present my position more clearly without social Hacker News repercussions, I will. edit: funny, how I do the same in real life, with my career, etc. I withhold strong positions, and give watered down expressions, to survive. Kinda sad. Lack of real anonymity means I also have to moderate expressions. Any future employer finding me here will hold everything I say here against me.
- bhauer 13y agoI understand. I was merely curious, and I don't ask you to put yourself in a position where your professional or personal integrity is in jeopardy! If there is more to share anonymously elsewhere, just let me know. :)