29 ms·
It's fine to marshal public money to spur greater debate, but 6) is a tax on free speech. In other words, he's proposing that you can only speak your mind if y
by sologoub 13y ago
It's fine to marshal public money to spur greater debate, but 6) is a tax on free speech.
In other words, he's proposing that you can only speak your mind if you also cite opposing views. Once you allow that, then you can go further and restrict speech on the quality/quantity of opposition presented. It's reckless to even consider such restrictions.
- rayiner 13y ago> It's reckless to even consider such restrictions. Ironically, you're criticizing a professor as being reckless simply for proposing certain ideas in an academic paper...