4 ms·
I think that .NET was being developed some time before Ballmer ascended to the CEO throne. Gates probably had more to do with it than him. Ballmer is/was proba
by hybridweb 13y ago
I think that .NET was being developed some time before Ballmer ascended to the CEO throne. Gates probably had more to do with it than him.
Ballmer is/was probably a good CEO for a conservative, old school company, which can derive profits from a stable and well used product line.
But that's not what MS is/was advertised as being about. In that circumstance, Ballmer is the wrong type of CEO.
- Pxtl 13y agoAnd it's worth noticing that many parts of the .NET framework have gone through horrible hiccups. I mean, while the C# language is great, it feels like every framework built around a .NET seems to be implemented and then dropped without substantial improvements about 3 years later. As a developer, nothing ever seems to get fixed. They get replaced, and the replacements bring a new learning curve and a suite of new bugs and problems, and these bugs can never be fixed for backwards-compatibility reasons. So we get a constant barrage of misstep boondoggles like Web Forms, Click Once Installers, Linq2SQL getting deprecated almost as soon as it was launched, etc. And with every step a larger pile of configuration and attributes that need to be added to get things to play nice with the OS.
- Roboprog 13y agoI hate Microsoft, but... there are crappy frameworks in Java-land, too. I don't know that Oracle is going to do any better with future Java frameworks.