2 ms·
Agreed. I thought "Paradigm: Yes" was hilarious, but the Perl row has a few errors. "Function Overloading" should be "N/A" for a language without subroutine s
by Strang 13y ago
Agreed. I thought "Paradigm: Yes" was hilarious, but the Perl row has a few errors.
"Function Overloading" should be "N/A" for a language without subroutine signatures. Any Perl function can take any combination of arguments and decide what to do with them. This is used to create de facto function overloading.
"Method Pointers: No" is ridiculous. Perl has subroutine references, which includes methods. You can even use a method name string as a method reference if you need to.