4 ms·
I'd say its the Guardian being responsible. The idea is to hold government to account, not risk people on the ground.
by alan_cx 13y ago
I'd say its the Guardian being responsible. The idea is to hold government to account, not risk people on the ground.
- colin_jack 13y agoExactly, and the fact they've continued publishing despite the DA-notice [1][2] is sign enough that they are in no way interested in rolling over. [1] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/17/defence-d-bbc-media-censor-surveillance-security http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/17/defence-d-bbc-m... [2] http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/guardian-g8-spying-revelations-were-breach-da-notice-guidance-doesnt-explain-lack-follow http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/guardian-g8-spying-rev...