5 ms·
Cool idea. You should mention upfront that you're using Fibers under the hood, since it has important performance implications. Also, your Wait.for function onl
by casual_slacker 13y ago
Cool idea. You should mention upfront that you're using Fibers under the hood, since it has important performance implications. Also, your Wait.for function only takes functions right now; but if you check for a .then function you can accept promises too.
- lucio 13y agoThanks. I've put a link to node-fibers, 2nd line of readme. ¿are Fiber's performance problems solvable? ¿what if fibers were integrated in node core?
- AdrianRossouw 13y agofibers will never be integrated into node core. for what it's worth, I also refuse to use or depend on any code that makes use of node-fibers. I know i'm far from the only person who feels that way too.