> they'd argue the risk for abuse is outweighed by the consequences of terrorism( I statement I'd disagree with) Precisely, and I agree with your disagreement

> they'd argue the risk for abuse is outweighed by the consequences of terrorism( I statement I'd disagree with) Precisely, and I agree with your disagreement there. They tout "zero deaths from terrorism" as though that were the primary objective. It isn't. I'd rather die in a terrorist attack while living free than live in fear of the state.