3 ms·
> "She laughed and said that no, I did not understand what it was to have secret police following you about... " It is too expensive and inefficient to follow
by joering2 13y ago
> "She laughed and said that no, I did not understand what it was to have secret police following you about... "
It is too expensive and inefficient to follow everyone personally. You can instead shoot a satellite in the space that each second takes high-definition infrared photos of Earth and can pinpoint/track/identify each person by their uniquely located veins/blood packets on their shoulders. See? Khazakhstan v. 2.0.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/09/13/secret-us-spy-satellite-launches-into-space-after-6-week-delay/ http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/09/13/secret-us-spy-sate...
- hollerith 13y agoThe URL does not support any of the assertions in your comment.
- namenotrequired 13y agoIt is also from fox'news'...
- drivebyacct2 13y agoPretty sure it was merely an example of how mass surveillance is easier than individual surveillance. In fact, being a super-set, if they're good enough at it, it's nearly guaranteed to be more effective.
- beedogs 13y agoFYI, drivebyacct2: you've been hellbanned for some reason as well. I looked through your comment history and have no idea why. Just thought you might want to know, as it looks like it happened 2 months ago.