3 ms·
> a large population of people who have been in the game for a long time and still engaged as founders, executives, or investors Yeah, I dunno. Today Silicon
by aryastark 13y ago
> a large population of people who have been in the game for a long time and still engaged as founders, executives, or investors
Yeah, I dunno. Today Silicon Valley sounds more and more like the old money club of Wall Street than the kids in the garage that will soon revolutionize the world.
Of course, a big part of revolutionizing the world is not knowing you're doing it. You can't throw a rock and miss a start-up in SF that isn't planning on "changing the world" right now. Most are doomed.
- tsunamifury 13y agoMost were always doomed. Its an odds game and you get a few game-changers by achieving a critical mass of startups in a given area, then allowing them to cross-polinate and share resources in order to breed more successful startups. Your statement is an example of a non-bay-area mindset. Failure if a badge of honor -- it means you contributed to the community.
- michaelochurch 13y agoFailure if a badge of honor -- it means you contributed to the community. Founders move on to get jobs as VCs or high-ranking executives at more stable companies. Employees lose their jobs and don't get any severance. Yes, honorable.
- tsunamifury 13y agoMichael, I think your pragmatic perspective here is important, but I disagree. If you aren't prepared financially to play the startup game, you shouldn't. If you do play, you should be WELL AWARE of the risks associated. It is a game, you play for sport not survival.
- michaelochurch 13y agoThe problem is that, while founders are aware, most startup employees have no idea and there are plenty of companies that make a policy of deliberately misleading people.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- robrenaud 13y agoWhy does "not knowing you are doing it" matter at all? Here is evidence that Google wanted to "organize the world's information" in 1999. http://googlepress.blogspot.com/1999/06/google-receives-25-million-in-equity.html http://googlepress.blogspot.com/1999/06/google-receives-25-m... Certainly world changing success is very rare. But explicitly aiming for it seems like it would help rather than hurt.
- felipe 13y ago> Today Silicon Valley sounds more and more like the old money club of Wall Street ... or Holywood, where VCs (producers) minimize risk by funding well-known formulas betting that a blockbuster will save the summer, while talented programmers (actors) get any job out there, stay a few months, cash in and go to the next gig. A bunch of other untalented wannabes (biz devs, MBAs, PRs) act as talent scouts, schmoozing at "parties" (meet-ups) trying to find the next fresh-out-of-the-boat programmer to exploit. In that sense, I believe NYC and other areas provide a much healthier environment for true "indie" productions (aka customer-centric development)
- michaelochurch 13y agoI believe NYC and other areas provide a much healthier environment for true "indie" productions (aka customer-centric development) I love NYC as a city, but New York VC-istan is awful. Just fucking taint-sniffingly hideous. Unimaginative, with even more MBA-culture. And the sorts of MBAs that end up in New York startups are catastrophically bad-- people who just weren't smart enough to stay in finance (and that doesn't take much). Go to "other areas" if you want an indie scene: places that are clearly on the rise like Austin, Durham, Boulder and Baltimore. Funding will be harder to get, though.