3 ms·
But it does mean his facts are more likely to be wrong. Or lacking the full story and the other facts that disprove his point and are conveniently left out. R
by JohnTHaller 13y ago
But it does mean his facts are more likely to be wrong. Or lacking the full story and the other facts that disprove his point and are conveniently left out. Remember, the Cato Institute (Koch brothers) and News Corporation (Murdoch) are intentionally biased organizations that design studies and stories to make specific points that further their agenda. This anti-'ObamaCare' piece in the WSJ carries about as much weight as a pro-'ObamaCare' piece in a left-biased rag.
- millstone 13y agoIt carries no weight. The article casts aspersions on Obamacare, but does not give a single example of how Obamacare has or will affect this patient. We are told that this patient chose a low-cost health insurance policy due to his financial situation. He is exactly the sort of person who is likely to benefit from Obamacare when the subsidies kick in.