4 ms·
It is plausible that it was the TSA's "VIPR". https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/08/10/vipr-a10.html https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/08/10/vipr-a10.ht
by jlgreco 13y ago
It is plausible that it was the TSA's "VIPR".
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/08/10/vipr-a10.html https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/08/10/vipr-a10.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/us/tsa-expands-duties-beyond-airport-security.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/us/tsa-expands-duties-beyo...
(Side note, who the hell comes up with these names, and why hasn't somebody with some experience with marketing and PR talked to them?)
- schiffern 13y ago>marketing and PR Oh, they have it. You're just not the TSA's customer.
- jlgreco 13y agoAre they trying to pitch a new line of action figures for the G.I. Joes to fight to Hasbro? "VIPR" is just plain silly.
- tudborg 13y agoA name that clearly shows the abbreviation came first
- eli_gottlieb 13y agoGiven the actual behavior of the government, I think it's a perfectly reasonable hypothesis that some of our "elected" officials have actually just decided to play supervillain.