3 ms·
I think you may be mistaken on this. Craigslist specifically argued that masking their IP address to bypass blocking "violated the CFAA and Penal Code § 502" an
by Zuider 13y ago
I think you may be mistaken on this. Craigslist specifically argued that masking their IP address to bypass blocking "violated the CFAA and Penal Code § 502" and District Judge Charles Breyer agreed.
- anigbrowl 13y agoYes - because 3taps had already been given proper legal notice in the form of a C&D letter (which was CL's right to issue as a property owner), and 3taps knew that it was no longer welcome to access CL.