"U.S.-backed 2009 coup" is really misstating what happened. First of all, the US was pressuring Honduras to re-instate the president. Next, there were complex

"U.S.-backed 2009 coup" is really misstating what happened. First of all, the US was pressuring Honduras to re-instate the president. Next, there were complex constitutional issues. The US ambassador's opinion isn't more important than the Honduran supreme court. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Honduran_constitutional_crisis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Honduran_constitutional_cr...