3 ms·

What disgusts me is all the "C is faster" talk. Common Lisp was used with bare metal on a particular type of machine. In fact, the Movitz OS still deals with ba

• mahmud 17y ago
  Common Lisp is sometimes frighteningly more bare-metal than C. I spent all last night moving stuff from kernel-space, into user space, messing with them in Lisp and sending them back up stream to the networking stack. By hand :-) In C, even though you work with low-level memory regions and system primitives, you're not interacting with them. By the time you see side-effects the process has long exited. In Lisp you can have open descriptors floating around in your shell where you can echo and read stuff to them; you can share a working buffer with a unix system call or signal, and see it get filled, changed and emptied! To realize that you can layer higher-level conceptual tools over these primitives, including the entire CLOS metaobject protocol, is something that's utterly gorgeous. See what iolib does to Unix, specially see the multiplexing framework; that's right, first class CLOS classes as wrappers for poll, select, epoll and kselect; your choice. Writing specializing methods for system calls is something no C programmer could ever imagine, much less enjoy ;-)