3 ms·
> "there were several times where we got you the right result even though it didn't have the exact words you asked for" How do you know that? Just because I cl
by kbart 13y ago
> "there were several times where we got you the right result even though it didn't have the exact words you asked for"
How do you know that? Just because I click on a result doesn't mean it was the correct one. I usually click on A LOT of results just to check if MAYBE there is something relevant (which is mostly not, especially with Google lately).
- sigkill 13y agoMaybe they should have another metric that if you click on a second result after the first result, then the first result should get penalized a little. Repeat steps for 'n' clicked results.
- kbart 13y agoWell, that might not be true as well. Sometimes you just want to to check information from more than one source or the result is correct but you want more on that topic and hope to find it in the next results etc. For example, you search for a technical term and (naturally) the first result is a definition in Wiki, but you already know the basics and want a deeper knowledge so you just skip to next results instead. It would not be fair to penalise Wiki for that.
- sigkill 13y agoWhat I meant is, not the first result on the list, but the first result that you click, and then press back and then click on the second result.
- Geee 13y agoMost people I know just open every result in new tabs and continue recursing forward, pruning irrelevant or slow-loading tabs in the process.